Tagged: DNC

DNC

One week after Democrats in Congress announced their new "populist" agenda—“A Better Deal: Better Jobs, Better Wages, Better Future”—the Yes Men, posing as DNC representatives, took to the stage at the Politicon conference in Pasadena, CA (and live on Twitter and Facebook), to call the DNC's bluff and highlight the "Better Deal's" supposedly lesser-known features: Medicare for all, free college tuition, stronger unions, an end to corporate lobbying, and so on—all issues that are popular across the political spectrum, and have already been winning on the local level even in Trump-voting districts, but that have not been pushed for by the DNC in decades. Why not? The answer is in the talk and fake announcement. See photos and highlights video here.

Read more

Inaugural #DNCTakeBack town hall at Pasadena Convention Center, July 29, 2017
Transcript of introduction by Frank Spencer, Deputy Vice Chair for Civic Engagement at the DNC

Thank you, Jennifer. The "Better Deal" is indeed a profound turning point that takes us right back to our progressive roots. As Sen. Schumer said last week: if you lose to someone with 40% popularity, "you look in the mirror and say, 'What did we do wrong?'" And I'd like to add, you also have to take action in order to win the next time around.

And so that's what we've done. Back in December, we began a series of town halls and focus groups to determine what voters across the political spectrum needed and wanted, so we could understand how we'd failed to address those concerns. What we found mirrored the national polls, as well as a whole slew of state and local elections:

  • a solid majority of Americans wanted universal, government-sponsored healthcare, including almost half of republicans;
  • a majority wanted stronger unions;
  • two thirds wanted tuition-free college;
  • non-interventionism was very popular - as we know, a number of voters supported Trump because of his promises to get out of conflicts;
  • and almost everyone thought Wall Street had far too much influence - and many would get rid of corporate lobbying altogether, as well as institute the public financing of elections.

Once we had understood which concerns we had failed to address, we began to look at how we could do so in the future. And that's when we realized: we couldn't. Our hands were tied, in large part because of our donors:

  • Medicare for all would be a disaster for insurance companies and big pharma, who are among our largest donors. They loved Obamacare, but Medicare for all, not so much.
  • The schools that almost all of us hail from, as well as our donors in education, would be opposed to tuition-free college.
  • It would be pretty hard for our military contractor donors to give up the $400 billion dollars per year that foreign interventions help bring their way.
  • And as for preventing corporations from lobbying and financing elections - it's hard to imagine any of our donors liking that one very much.

If we were going to have a "Better Deal" - if we were going to adopt the positions that could actually win future elections - then we had to begin by severing our donor relationships, which would also pave the way for a more collective kind of fundraising support, which was proven quite possible in this last election on both sides of the fight.

So after passing a resolution first proposed by Christine Pelosi in February to prevent corporate donations to the DNC, we adopted a series of similar measures that freed us to champion the most popular, people-friendly, election-winning policies:

  • medicare for all;
  • strong unions;
  • tuition-free college;
  • non-interventionism;
  • reducing corporate influence;
  • the abolition of private prisons - another issue popular across the political spectrum;
  • and also getting even more firmly behind renewable energy - which three quarters of Trump voters support, perhaps in part because of the huge number of jobs it creates.

But allow me to talk about jobs for a minute. Studies suggest that half of all remaining jobs - blue- and white-collar - could be automated away within 20 years. Regardless of whether that happens, a Universal Basic Income will help all people have a good future, regardless of their position in the wolf-eat-dog ethos that has been shaping up in our country. And a UBI would also represent, and necessitate, a step back from that ethos.

We can't let corporations, or corporate politicians, decide how it all works out. In the past, again and again, the people behind the Party of the People stood up against corporations and their politicians to achieve most of the things we call civilized: social security, the 8-hour workday, the weekend, an end to child labor, and so on.

It's time once again for people to decide how the world ought to be, and to stop leaving decisions in the hands of the children with the most toys. Starting today, the Democratic Party is going to serve the people once again by fighting for what people need and want, and that therefore wins elections. And we will begin by fighting to reduce the outsize influence of corporations in our democracy, by outlawing corporate lobbying in government and establishing the public financing of elections.

That's what the #DNCTakeBack is all about - because "better" just isn't good enough.

Read more